On Thursday 21 June 2007 16:07:14 Christian MICHON wrote: > On 6/21/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's a video of an ex-debian maintainer (Martin Michlmayr, never heard > > of him) giving Google a talk about the advantages of time based release > > management. > > (...) > > Yes, I think uClibc should do this, in case it wasn't clear. > > isn't this dedicated to *large* developments in particular?
Large development projects benefit more, but busybox after the 1.0 release was certainly large enough to benefit from this, and I think uClibc is too. > > Your designated release pesterer, (how goes the merge of nptl into the > > main tree, by the way?) > > yes, but you pester with cakes :) I pestered _Erik_ with cakes. Mike hasn't put his mailing address online that I've been able to find yet. :) Rob -- "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
