Rob Landley wrote: > Here's a video of an ex-debian maintainer (Martin Michlmayr, never heard of > him) giving Google a talk about the advantages of time based release > management. > > ABSTRACT: Time based releases are made according to a specific time interval, > instead of making release when particular functionality or set of features > have been implemented. This talk will argue that time based release > management acts as an effective coordination mechanism in large volunteer > projects and will show examples from seven projects that have moved to time > based releases: Debian, GCC, GNOME, Linux, OpenOffice, Plone, and X.org. > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5503858974016723264 > > Yes, I think uClibc should do this, in case it wasn't clear. > > Your designated release pesterer, (how goes the merge of nptl into the main > tree, by the way?) hi, I provided with Steve, some weeks ago, all the patch for the nptl port over SH4. He should have had defined a strategy for the merge as he told me... probably he is vry busy at this time, anyway I haven't pinged him any more.
Carmelo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc