On Monday 13 August 2007 2:36:12 am Koen Kooi wrote: > Rob Landley schreef: > > On Sunday 12 August 2007 4:20:01 pm Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Rob Landley schreef: > >>> If there are patches against mainline that add blackfin support to the > >>> most recent release version of gcc, I'll happily test them. But > >>> starting from a separate tarball is uninteresting. > >> > >> Mainline gcc already support blackfin (from 4.0.x iirc), but not the > >> extra funky command line options like -mfdpic or -mleaf-shared-id. I > >> just succesfully built (well, OE built it) the uclibc fork with a pretty > >> vanilla gcc 4.2.1 and the elf2flt wrapper. > > > > Cool! Rummage, rummage... Looks like the prefix is bfin, so the tuple > > would be bfin-unknown-linux... Nope, binutils dies saying ld doesn't > > recognize it during the "make configure-host" stage. (That's tuple works > > for every other platform I've tried, but apparently blackfin is > > "special".) > > I use bfin-angstrom-uclinux-uclibc as tuple (unknown works as well, but I > like branding :))
I don't know about gcc 4.1.2, but bfin-unknown-linux didn't work with binutils 2.17 and bfin-elf did... I'm up to poking at uClibc, but have been distracted and should probably finish up m68k first. Thanks, Rob -- "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
