On Tue 21 Aug 2007 07:46, Bernhard Fischer pondered: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 09:41:55AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > >I'm in the same kind of situation as Rob, I want to have my *own* > distribution running on > >the board. I don't care as much about standard sources as Rob, maybe > I'm a bit more > >pragmatic :) > > > >The fun starts when you have to build a avr32 gcc and bfin gcc from the > >same source. An excerpt from the patch that Atmel distributes (for > >gcc 4.0.2): > > > >- -| avr-* \ > >- -| bfin-* | bs2000-* \ > >+| avr-* | avr32-* \ > >+| bs2000-* \ > > > >ehm... that's 'special' > > They don't even seem to be able to provide patches that work with all > the boards they try to sell, so this little gem isn't really > surprising.. It seems to be natural to have one source tarball (of > about everything) per board, with conflicting patches (and redundant > patches). > Imagine 6000 kernel-source tarballs, each supporting one different > device.. > *shrug*
I assume that when you say "they" you mean Atmel? I think that the Blackfin stuff is pretty clean in this regard. -Robin _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
