On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:45:20AM +0200, Christian MICHON wrote: >On 8/26/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Saturday 25 August 2007 8:51:48 am Bernhard Fischer wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:34:06PM -0500, Kevin Day wrote: >> > >internal_function sounds like it is supposed to be internal to uClibc. >> > >> > This is already fixed in svn. A patch which fixes this for the 0.9.29 >> > release can be obtained from buildroot. >> >> Are there any plans for a 0.9.29.1 release, for those of us who don't use >> buildroot? (I don't use buildroot, gentoo embedded doesn't use buildroot...) >> >> Rob > >I guess Rob has a point here: release early, release often... > >+1 vote for an update on the release, please ? :)
Ignoring vapier's/andersee'ns busiyness for a moment, it's not that currently trunk is rapidly moving, even WRT NPTL, so i suggest you use that meanwhile. PS: At least _i_ didn't fixup the branch, so you'd be better off to look at the diff between the branch-point and current trunk iff you were to release an update, fwiw. PPS: I'd be tempted to remember the rev of current trunk, skim over psm's patch, apply that and then see how to get the arm-NPTL into that majourly touched-up state, fyi. YMMV as may the available time of yours. Opinions on such a heresy (of course i wouldn't test it)? kind etc, yours _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
