On 8/27/07, Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:45:20AM +0200, Christian MICHON wrote: > >On 8/26/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Saturday 25 August 2007 8:51:48 am Bernhard Fischer wrote: > >> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:34:06PM -0500, Kevin Day wrote: > >> > >internal_function sounds like it is supposed to be internal to uClibc. > >> > > >> > This is already fixed in svn. A patch which fixes this for the 0.9.29 > >> > release can be obtained from buildroot. > >> > >> Are there any plans for a 0.9.29.1 release, for those of us who don't use > >> buildroot? (I don't use buildroot, gentoo embedded doesn't use > >> buildroot...) > >> > >> Rob > > > >I guess Rob has a point here: release early, release often... > > > >+1 vote for an update on the release, please ? :) > > Ignoring vapier's/andersee'ns busiyness for a moment, it's not that > currently trunk is rapidly moving, even WRT NPTL, so i suggest you use > that meanwhile. > > PS: At least _i_ didn't fixup the branch, so you'd be better off to look > at the diff between the branch-point and current trunk iff you were to > release an update, fwiw. > > PPS: I'd be tempted to remember the rev of current trunk, skim over > psm's patch, apply that and then see how to get the arm-NPTL into that > majourly touched-up state, fyi. YMMV as may the available time of yours. > Opinions on such a heresy (of course i wouldn't test it)? > > kind etc, > yours >
I just grabbed uclibc svn 19706... but my concerns are not arm related. I'll leave this to Rob. thanks -- Christian -- http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
