Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 09:10 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> as reported into glibc bug #5104 >> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5104) >> >> > [snip] > > I am good with this change. One question though: I don't think the > STT_SECTION and STT_FILE are present in a relocatable object. If this > is true(needs to be checked), then the above if stmt can be changed to: > #define STT_RELOC_MAX STT_TLS > or > #define STT_RELOC_MAX STT_COMMON > if (ELF_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info) > STT_RELOC_MAX) > > or if the above assumption is true only for STT_FILE > if (ELF_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info) > STT_RELOC_MAX || ELF_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info) == > STT_SECTION) > This is the case, STT_SECTION symbol are present into symbol table of the libuClibc.so.0 for sure. Actually, I did not find any STT_FILE symbols...
Carmelo > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
