On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 12:15 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 09:10 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > > > >> Hi Folks, > >> as reported into glibc bug #5104 > >> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5104) > >> > >> > > [snip] > > > > I am good with this change. One question though: I don't think the > > STT_SECTION and STT_FILE are present in a relocatable object. If this > > is true(needs to be checked), then the above if stmt can be changed to: > > #define STT_RELOC_MAX STT_TLS > > or > > #define STT_RELOC_MAX STT_COMMON > > if (ELF_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info) > STT_RELOC_MAX) > > > > or if the above assumption is true only for STT_FILE > > if (ELF_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info) > STT_RELOC_MAX || ELF_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info) > > == STT_SECTION) > > > This is the case, STT_SECTION symbol are present into symbol table of > the libuClibc.so.0 for sure. > Actually, I did not find any STT_FILE symbols...
Right, but they are STB_LOCAL I think. If so they are skipped anyway. > > Carmelo > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
