On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:01:56AM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > >On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 19:56 +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:32:48PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> >Natanael Copa wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Here is a patch for the c99 math func log2(). If this gets applied I >> >> will look into the other c99 math funcs as well. >> >> >> >> exp2 >> >> fdim >> >> fma >> >> fmax >> >> fmin >> >> nearbyint >> >> nexttoward >> >> remquo >> >> scalbln >> >> tgamma >> >> trunc >> >> >> >> I dont know how to use the test suite. Looks like test-double is just >> >> disabled and I never managed to get the test suite to pass. I would be >> >> thankful if someone could give me a hint. >> >> >> >> -nc >> >> >> >Hi Natanael, >> >I usually run the testsuite. I'll try to integrate your patch in my code >> >and check the tests. >> >I'll keep you informed. >> >> Any status update, Carmelo? >> >> It would be nice if any function would be exercised in the testsuite, >> especially new ones. >> >> Does it make sense to make some or all of the functions listed above >> configurable (separately or on block)? Opinions? > >I noticed that there are not really any programs using log2. It would be >nice if we could get sorted out which of the funcs that are really used >and should be prioritized.
If we can subsummize some or individual funcs depending one a certain standard, then all is well (see bsd-compat in e.g. network or others). If they are non-standard but just serve as glibc-compat, then please state so both in configury as in help-text and resubmit accordingly. TIA, > >-nc > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
