Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > > Hello, > I've executed your test built against glibc2.61 and it fails as uClibc. > I have not spent time to investigate what is the correct behavior. > So, are we sure uClibc needs to be fixed ? >
I tested it on uclibc-0.9.29 based system not on glibc system. The mknod change seems to be required in uclibc but the test application has to be redone. -Mansoor _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
