Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > This change does definitely not look ok, given that it seems to only fix > a fraction of affected arches, AFAICS? > > $ egrep "short.*kernel_dev_t" */bits/*.h > arm/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > bfin/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > cris/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > e1/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > frv/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > h8300/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > i386/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > m68k/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > nios/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > sh/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > sh64/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > sparc/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; > vax/bits/kernel_types.h:typedef unsigned short __kernel_dev_t; Yes I agree, even other arches have to be fixed. I could validate my changes only on ARM arch. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
