Bernhard Fischer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > > Sounds like your revision 22684 broke the auto-testers since a plain > $ make check > doesn't work (anymore? Not sure if it worked before, i suspect it did). > > We need at least (Makefile.in): > -test check: > +test check: test_compile >
Yes, you're right. aplogies. The reason is that I do etsting into two steps: firstly cross-compile them, then install and use make run to execute them so I forgot the one shot case. > Also, the test dir has to pickup the correct flags, which it currently > doesn't, i think. > Care to have a look? > Yes, now we don't use all CFLAGS used for building the uclibc, so likely we are missign something. Currently I'm not able to check it. Carmelo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
