On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Bernhard Fischer wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> >> Sounds like your revision 22684 broke the auto-testers since a plain >> $ make check >> doesn't work (anymore? Not sure if it worked before, i suspect it did). >> >> We need at least (Makefile.in): >> -test check: >> +test check: test_compile >> > > Yes, you're right. aplogies. The reason is that I do etsting into two > steps: firstly cross-compile them, then install and use make run to > execute them so I forgot the one shot case.
The repeated make[2]: Nothing to be done for `compile'. is quite ugly. Perhaps you can just add to COMPILE_TARGETS and use those as prerequisites directly? >> Also, the test dir has to pickup the correct flags, which it currently >> doesn't, i think. >> Care to have a look? >> > Yes, now we don't use all CFLAGS used for building the uclibc, so likely > we are missign something. Currently I'm not able to check it. Perhaps we can get away with just using the toplevel Rules.mk in test/Rules.mk so the latter would only contain that include and the few test-specific settings. I will not try this myself, though. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
