Cristi Magherusan wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:15 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> Cristi Magherusan wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I noticed that the gentoo uclibc ebuild[1] applies a considerable amount >>> of patches[2]. Has anyone investigated how many of them worth including >>> in the main uclibc tree? Personally, I'm most interested about the libm >>> ones, but the other ones may be nice to have too. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Cristi >>> >>> [1] http://www.gentoo-portage.com/AJAX/Ebuild/66923 >>> [2] http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/gentoo/distfiles/ >>> uClibc-0.9.28.3-patches-1.8.tar.bz2 >>> >>> >> Being this patch set against 0.9.28 release, that is an old release, >> I assume that most of these fixes should be already into the current >> main stream. Doing this kind of analysis, even if could shown some >> unknown problem, is time consuming. I honestly don't have time for this now. > > The ones I know for sure that are missing both from the latest release and CVS > are the ones that add those extra functions to libm, and that I really need > in > order to compile kvm and link it against uClibc. > > Best regards, > Cristi >
May you create an ad hoc patch for this missing libm functions and propose for adding to uclibc. A config option will be required to selectively enable/disable this extra... what are they ? Carmelo > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
