On Sep 22, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Chase N Douglas wrote:
On Sep 22, 2008, at 3:39 AM, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase Douglas
Sent: den 19 september 2008 22:21
To: Chase N Douglas
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: pthreads stress test hangs on read() returning EINTR

On Sep 19, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Chase N Douglas wrote:
I believe I have found the issue. Suppose there are threads A and B. Thread A is running and is in the critical section of malloc() where
locks are held to manage the heap and such. A context switch then
occurs before thread A can relinquish the malloc locks. Thread B now attempts to fork. After forking, the parent process (still thread B)
continues as normal, but the new child process immediately attempts
to free the manager thread resources as it's no longer needed. At
this point, the child process attempts to grab the malloc locks to
free the memory, but it sees that someone is holding the lock (what
used to be thread A). We now have a deadlock since even if thread A
relinquishes the lock, it's in a separate process now with a
separate virtual memory space. The lock state in the child process
will never be relinquished. For this reason, such locks should be
held before forking, the parent process after the fork should
relinquish them, and the child process after the fork should
reinitialize them.

However, there are many locks in uClibc and not a single one is
managed in this way before and after forking. Shouldn't every single
lock be dealt with before and after forking, or am I missing
something here?

After a second glance I see that the only locks this applies to are
pthread_mutex_t locks and other types derived from pthread_mutex_t
locks. Inside uClibc itself this seems to be only malloc locks and
regex locks. I will be trying to put together a patch that will take
care of both of these types of locks when forking.

Please take a look at

http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-March/019187.html

which reported this problem half a year ago...

Thanks for pointing that out. However, like the submitter notes, it's not a full solution as it only encompasses the malloc-standard mutex. I need to be sure that a hang is not possible from any mutex so my thought is to take the mutex initialization macros and turn them into functions that will register the internal mutexes so that when fork() is called we can make sure to grab each mutex before we proceed.

According to the POSIX standard for fork (man 3p fork):

"If a multi-threaded process calls fork(), the new process shall contain a replica of the calling thread and its entire address space, possibly including the states of mutexes and other resources. Consequently, to avoid errors, the child process may only execute async-signal-safe operations until such time as one of the exec functions is called."

Here's a listing of all the POSIX stipulated async-signal-safe functions: http://docsun.cites.uiuc.edu/sun_docs/C/solaris_9/SUNWdev/MTP/p40.html .

I have audited the uClibc source code to try to find all the mutexes used by these functions so that a proper fork call will not hang as long as the child process only uses these async-signal-safe functions. My audit (hopefully accurate) showed that the only mutexes used were malloc mutexes and two fork mutexes (pthread_atfork mutex and pthread_once_mutex).

The attached patch locks all of these mutexes before calling the real fork syscall. The parent thread unlocks the mutexes afterwards while the child process reinitializes them. All three malloc libraries are supported and compile cleanly, however, only malloc-standard was tested. A modification to the "malloc" (i.e. not malloc-standard nor malloc-simple) library was made to remove the two heap locks from the heap structure so they could be made available through an extern variable. Also, a new __libc_lock_init_adaptive macro was added to the libc-lock.h header as well as a modification of the __libc_lock_init_recursive macro as its form did not match up with the current recursive lock type.

Thanks,
Chase Douglas

Attachment: uclibc-ptfork-mutexes.patch
Description: Binary data


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to