-----Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -----
>On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:14:27PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On Oct 6, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> ping.
>>>
>>> Any comments from people who care about thread ?
>>>
>>> As a reminder:
>>> - http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4994
>>> - http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-March/019187.html
>>>
>>> It could be nice to take a look before 0.9.30 release.
>>
>> Just to be clear, both of these tackle the same issue, but the first
>> should cover all cases, while the second is specific to malloc-standard
>> and does not cover the pthreads_atfork mutex.
>
>This patch (which went in as r23660) broke
>- no threads
>- malloc debug
Do you have any information on how the patch broke these two scenarios?
Were they compilation errors, or runtime errors? What malloc stack(s)
broke? I have not been able to reproduce the issues myself, but I have been
running an older version of uClibc, not 0.9.30-rc2.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
