On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:17:30AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> Removing LINUXTHREADS_OLD might be a good idea.  (This still has nothing
> to do with NPTL.)  Having two is silly, and anything that's wrong with
> the newer linuxthreads should be _fixed_ before NPTL goes in. 
> Eliminating unnecessary duplication is always a plus, and removing code
> where possible is what uClibc is all about, really.
>
> Rob

Hi,

yesterday I tested my armv4 simpad system with uclibc-svn and linuxthreads
not linuxthreads.old and I can confirm that it works aleast testing opie
enviroment compiled against qt embedded 2.3.10 multithreaded.

The patches I used can be find here:

1.
http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=org.openembedded.dev.git;a=blob;f=package
s/uclibc/uclibc-svn/arm-linuxthreads.patch;h=e222668a6698512cbbffda1561a6629
6f0509be1;hb=HEAD

This put in the missing files from glibc.

2.
http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=org.openembedded.dev.git;a=blob;f=package
s/uclibc/uclibc-svn/linuxthreads-changes.patch;h=f6f32cdd2941820425d6fb3c877
8ded6bdcc85eb;hb=HEAD

This was the patch posted from Will Newton a while ago here on the ml.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02185.html


Bye Henning

PS: In the first try I forgot to cc the mailing list so Rob only reads the mail 
only.
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to