On Sunday 07 September 2008 17:07:15 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > >Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth > >including in .30 release. > > > >- locale supports fixes > >- an optimized sh4 memcpy implementation (currently used > > since a long time in uclibc-nptl, glibc and kernel) > >- getdents > > - cleanup the libm problem. Either remove the problematic powerpc bits > or get written permission from Apple so > that "(C) Apple. All rights reserved" can be fixed to state that it's > actually BSD or LGPL or PD. We should not postpone to fix that up, the > 0.9.30 release should not be shipped with this problem, imho.
Unresolved license issues should never have been _checked_in_. Who did that and why? (Could you point me to the svn commit?) > Since i don't need those powerpc bits, i suggest they should be > removed now. If somebody complains then she should submit a fixed > version. Poke IBM? Also, the gentoo developers have their own improved libm, based on Peter Mazinger's work and backported on top of 0.9.28 (as far as I know). I should ping Solar about that... Rob _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
