Rob Landley wrote: > On Tuesday 04 November 2008 05:28:10 Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: >>> So this probably means that we should mark avr32 as broken in the >>> uclibc.org buildroot for now? >> The best would be if somebody using the toolchain supplied in >> uclibc.org Buildroot could sort out if all patches are included in GCC >> 4.2.2, binutils 2.17 and uClibc 0.9.29. > > Where does one _get_ an AVR32 test environment, anyway? (Alas, no qemu > support...) >
You have to run on real hardware for the time being. On the good side we have qemu in the thoughts, since there will be a need for a simulator to get the toolchain upstream. Qemu would be a natural choice. -- HC _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
