On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:57:23PM +0100, Stefan Assmann wrote: >Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:04:49AM +0100, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>>> The current implementation relies on the fact that INTERNAL_SYSCALL is >>> defined >>> for syscall sched_setaffinity. Otherwise the syscall will be treated as >>> non-existant even if it is implemented. This patch adds a check whether the >>> syscall is available if INTERNAL_SYSCALL is not defined. This was necessary >>> to >>> get sched_setaffinity working on ia64. >> >> All arches should define INTERNAL_SYSCALL, could you please add this >> for ia64 instead? > >Yes, can do. Any objections why this patch shouldn't be applied anyway? What's >the reason for not using the existing syscall? We want to switch to use INTERNAL_SYSCALL everywhere (so we don't have to do workarounds in libpthread, IIRC). Applying that patch would just paper over the fact that ia64 is apparently not converted yet (as a couple of other arches that apparently nobody uses or cares for) and as such doesn't fix the real issue. TIA, _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
