Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:04:49AM +0100, Stefan Assmann wrote: >> Subject: make use of sched_setaffinity if available >> >> From: Stefan Assmann <[email protected]> >> >> The current implementation relies on the fact that INTERNAL_SYSCALL is >> defined >> for syscall sched_setaffinity. Otherwise the syscall will be treated as >> non-existant even if it is implemented. This patch adds a check whether the >> syscall is available if INTERNAL_SYSCALL is not defined. This was necessary >> to >> get sched_setaffinity working on ia64. > > All arches should define INTERNAL_SYSCALL, could you please add this > for ia64 instead?
Yes, can do. Any objections why this patch shouldn't be applied anyway? What's the reason for not using the existing syscall? Stefan -- Stefan Assmann | SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Software Engineer | Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg Mail: [email protected] | GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
