On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 02:04:12AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
>Author: vda
>Date: 2009-02-08 02:04:10 +0000 (Sun, 08 Feb 2009)
>New Revision: 25262
>
>Log:
>nextafterf: trying to correct FP exception handling
>
>
>
>Added:
> trunk/uClibc/docs/probe_math_exception.c
>
>Modified:
> trunk/uClibc/libm/math_private.h
> trunk/uClibc/libm/s_nextafterf.c
>
>Modified: trunk/uClibc/libm/s_nextafterf.c
>===================================================================
>--- trunk/uClibc/libm/s_nextafterf.c 2009-02-07 22:30:39 UTC (rev 25261)
>+++ trunk/uClibc/libm/s_nextafterf.c 2009-02-08 02:04:10 UTC (rev 25262)
>@@ -38,12 +33,12 @@
> return y;
>
> if (ix == 0) { /* x == 0? */
>- float u;
>+// glibc 2.4 does not seem to set underflow?
>+// float u;
Denys please, pretty please do NOT add C99 comments in uClibc.
They break bootstrap with C89 compilers needlessly.
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
