On Friday 13 February 2009 15:44, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> >Modified: trunk/uClibc/libm/s_nextafterf.c
> >===================================================================
> >--- trunk/uClibc/libm/s_nextafterf.c 2009-02-07 22:30:39 UTC (rev 25261)
> >+++ trunk/uClibc/libm/s_nextafterf.c 2009-02-08 02:04:10 UTC (rev 25262)
>
> >@@ -38,12 +33,12 @@
> > return y;
> >
> > if (ix == 0) { /* x == 0? */
> >- float u;
> >+// glibc 2.4 does not seem to set underflow?
> >+// float u;
>
> Denys please, pretty please do NOT add C99 comments in uClibc.
> They break bootstrap with C89 compilers needlessly.
Fixed (this one). Any other instances?
--
vda
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
