> Peter, > I've changed in rev 25414 SH specific files to use > gcc built-in macros instead of relying on uclibc config ones > (that may changes one day for example). > Please let me know if this breaks uclibc on sh2[a].
Sorry about the delay, I tested it this morning on SH2A and it works OK. I think Bernhard is right in that SH2E should use this as well, but its not currently a uClibc config option and I don't think we have any SH2E hardware here to test on. I suppose adding the gcc builtin for SH2E would at least mean that someone building for SH2E would end up with some working system calls even if some other bits are broken. regards, Peter > > Cheers, > Carmelo > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkmiStUACgkQoRq/3BrK1s9q8ACeKYEL5uf9HyzWjdHLqXD+kB7Z > 6sQAn3x69EYDJ+8+6hyqzkzYv+B4TxE5 > =aJ7H > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
