-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Griffin wrote: >> Peter, >> I've changed in rev 25414 SH specific files to use >> gcc built-in macros instead of relying on uclibc config ones >> (that may changes one day for example). >> Please let me know if this breaks uclibc on sh2[a]. > > Sorry about the delay, I tested it this morning on SH2A and it works OK. > thanks for testing. > I think Bernhard is right in that SH2E should use this as well, but its > not currently a uClibc config option and I don't think we have any SH2E > hardware here to test on. > > I suppose adding the gcc builtin for SH2E would at least mean that > someone building for SH2E would end up with some working system calls > even if some other bits are broken. > > regards, > I'd wait for someone really using sh2e with uclibc. > Peter carmelo >> Cheers, >> Carmelo >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkmiStUACgkQoRq/3BrK1s9q8ACeKYEL5uf9HyzWjdHLqXD+kB7Z >> 6sQAn3x69EYDJ+8+6hyqzkzYv+B4TxE5 >> =aJ7H >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmjzZoACgkQoRq/3BrK1s8aKgCeI6j51Lh+k781k3YPaJx5IO7u bLYAnAu/mehDb0oh2Pwwi07tMDcCDusC =k+0Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
