On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Bernhard, > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:07:03PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:21:29PM +0000, Will Newton wrote: >>>Hello, >>> >>>I have a problem with linking applications statically with uClibc but >>>without including the stdio functions. This issue has been brought up >> >>See http://bugs.uClibc.org/1033 >>My theory (which is essentially size-neutral) goes like this, and yes, >>it's not pretty but seems to work for me: > > I've attached a possible fix to the PR. Thanks for working on this. I think the patch goes a bit too far however. The problem is only with symbols that are weak *and* hidden: libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c:extern void weak_function _stdio_init(void) attribute_hidden; libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c:extern void weak_function _locale_init(void) attribute_hidden; libc/misc/internals/shared_flat_add_library.c:extern void _init(void) attribute_hidden weak_function; libc/misc/internals/shared_flat_add_library.c:extern void _fini(void) attribute_hidden weak_function; libc/stdlib/_atexit.c:extern void weak_function _stdio_term(void) attribute_hidden; libc/stdlib/abort.c:extern void weak_function _stdio_term(void) attribute_hidden; __pthread_initialize_minimal and __errno_location are not hidden so do not need to be changed. Also the changes to _stdio.c look like they should be in a separate patch. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
