On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:27:22AM +0000, Will Newton wrote: > >>IMO this weak stuff is a holdover from the old days of ELKS etc., I'm >>not sure if it really is that useful any more. > > If i don't need stdio, then i don't want it being pulled in. If you > don't care, then you can as well live with this difference for > a simple write();return; program: > $ size static_stdio{,_glibc} > text data bss dec hex filename > 2572 128 36 2736 ab0 static_stdio > 512074 1928 6988 520990 7f31e static_stdio_glibc > I, personally, prefer the 3k variant over the 500k one.
500k? I rarely have a uClibc above 200k, not sure how you have managed to make one so large. What does the app actually do though? What is the use case for stdio-less apps in a static linked environment? I argue it is close to no use, and the fact that it has been broken for years and no-one has fixed it rather backs me up on that. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
