On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Salvatore CRO' <[email protected]> wrote: > Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> >> On 2/20/2010 4:25 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 2/10/2010 3:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> commit: >>>>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=ed0915ba70d0ff6ed0a78f45d46822763a580737 >>>>> branch: >>>>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=refs/heads/nptl_glibc_sync >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Khem, >>>> I have limited capabilities to contribute currently due to a healthy >>>> issue at my shoulder, I'll ask some engineers in my team to do a lot of >>>> tests on sh4. >>>> >>> >>> thanks Carmelo. is it booting on sh yet or not ? >>> >> >> not yet tested... I'll let you know. >> >> carmelo >> _______________________________________________ >> uClibc-cvs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc-cvs >> > > Hi Khem, Carmelo, > I gave a boot on 7111 ST soc after building this branch and seems ok. I also > did few (uClibc) testing with no issues.
Great. Did the regression tests work well too ? > > Salvo. > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
