On 2/23/2010 6:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Salvatore CRO' <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Salvatore CRO' <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/20/2010 4:25 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/10/2010 3:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> commit:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=ed0915ba70d0ff6ed0a78f45d46822763a580737
>>>>>>>> branch:
>>>>>>>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=refs/heads/nptl_glibc_sync
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Khem,
>>>>>>> I have limited capabilities to contribute currently due to a healthy
>>>>>>> issue at my shoulder, I'll ask some engineers in my team to do a lot
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> tests on sh4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks Carmelo. is it booting on sh yet or not ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> not yet tested... I'll let you know.
>>>>>
>>>>> carmelo
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> uClibc-cvs mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc-cvs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Khem, Carmelo,
>>>> I gave a boot on 7111 ST soc after building this branch and seems ok. I
>>>> also
>>>> did few (uClibc) testing with no issues.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Great. Did the regression tests work well too ?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Salvo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Whole uClibc test suite done on sh with no regressions.
> 
> very good. The branch is not merged into original nptl branch
you meant "is now merged" I guess

> so it would be good that you can carry on testing the nptl branch now.
> There are other changes done on top will need to be seen if they are ok
> on SH4 or not.
> 
>>
>> Salvo.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 

_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to