Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Timo Teräs <[email protected]> wrote on 2010/04/17 12:09:22:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Finally looked at the ldso patch and I am not entirely happy with it.
I think the general structure should be different to make it easier
to follow the code and port it to other archs. I can probably
take a stab at it during the weekend but I have no env. to test in
so I will have to do it blindly.
So this is what I came up with. I do wonder if not linux_resolver
need PROTECTED support too? Have you tested with LAZY relocation too?
Have not tested lazy yet.
The LAZY relocs is a bigger problem though. That has to work so it would be
great if
you could test that too.
Hi Timo, did you get a chance to test LAZY relocs too? Now that
NPTL is in main line it would be good to know if PROTECTED works
as is or if more work is needed.
Tested them now. LAZY works as expected too.
- Timo
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
