On Monday 26 April 2010 00:43:35 Timo Teräs wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >>>> So this is what I came up with. I do wonder if not linux_resolver > >>>> need PROTECTED support too? Have you tested with LAZY relocation too? > >>> > >>> Have not tested lazy yet. > >> > >> The LAZY relocs is a bigger problem though. That has to work so it would > >> be great if you could test that too. > > > > Hi Timo, did you get a chance to test LAZY relocs too? Now that > > NPTL is in main line it would be good to know if PROTECTED works > > as is or if more work is needed. > > Tested them now. LAZY works as expected too.
How do I test this? Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
