On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:51:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >On (10/05/10 00:02), Rob Landley wrote: >> So now that NPTL is in, it sounds like the next release should be either 1.0 >> or 1.0-pre. It is more or less feature complete, isn't it? > >yeah I have mentioned it on IRC couple of times to have next release be 1.0
the nptl addition would warrant bumping the version to 0.10.0, yes. I don't think messing around with the major version and thus UCLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER is justified for mere cosmetic numbers. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
