On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:51:53PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>On (10/05/10 00:02), Rob Landley wrote: >>> So now that NPTL is in, it sounds like the next release should be either 1.0 >>> or 1.0-pre. It is more or less feature complete, isn't it? >> >>yeah I have mentioned it on IRC couple of times to have next release be 1.0 > > the nptl addition would warrant bumping the version to 0.10.0, yes. > I don't think messing around with the major version and thus > UCLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER is justified for mere cosmetic numbers.
Would be nice with a beta tag/release unless there are more new features you want in there. -- Natanael Copa _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
