"Ed W" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> Why 0.9.32-rc2? IIRC after nptl support it was discussed that it >would >> be good >> to have 1.0.0 version for next release. > >I tend to agree that version 1.0.0 is a good choice? > >Version number is of course a completely arbitrary stake in the ground, > >but in a large number of projects it's used as a crude indicator of >project progress. The next release seems eminently worth of a 1.0 >number? > >Cheers > >Ed W >_______________________________________________ >uClibc mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Hi, Once we've done a full SUSv4 audit we could start thinking about something like a 1.0.0. This release will be 0.9.32 _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
