IIRC SuSv4 changed it's opinion and removed legacy from it

Peter
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:00:20 +0200
> Von: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: `utime(2)\' marked as legacy under linux

> Hello,
> 
> AFAICS the use of `utime(2)' is discouraged under Linux and it is not even
> available unless UCLIBC_SUSV4_LEGACY is defined; in fact it is suggested
> to use `utimes(2)'.  POSIX.1-2001 does the very opposite: `utimes(2)' is
> marked as legacy and it suggests use the use of `utime(2)' [1].
> 
> Am I missing something?  What do you think about it?
> 
> In case, I can prepare and submit a patch to include `utime(2)' and
> remove the warning message.
> 
> Thanks,
> Giuseppe
> 
> 
> 
> 1) http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/utimes.html
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

-- 
GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit 
gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to