http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
search for utimes (or see the sys/time.h)

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/utimes.html

Issue 6/SuSv3: legacy, Issue 7/SuSv4: legacy removed

Peter

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:10:54 -0400
> Von: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: `utime(2)\' marked as legacy under linux

> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:46:27PM +0200, Peter Mazinger wrote:
> > 
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > Datum: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:14:37 +0200
> > > Von: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
> > > An: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]>, "Peter Mazinger"
> <[email protected]>
> > > CC: [email protected]
> > > Betreff: Re: `utime(2)\' marked as legacy under linux
> > 
> > > Thanks for your comments.
> > > 
> > > Is the following patch ok?
> > 
> > not really, utime is obsolete in SuSv4 (and the utime.h header as well)
> > utimes was legacy in SuSv3 but was "reenabled" in SuSv4
> 
> On what are you basing this information? I can't find utimes in SUSv4
> at all? It seems to have been completely removed. The non-obsolete
> functions are "futimens" and "utimensat", declared in sys/stat.h.
> 
> Wait, "utimes" is also in the documentation for the above, under the
> XSI option, but it does not appear in the ToC. I suppose this is an
> error. In any case, I think only "futimens" and "utimensat" should be
> used, especially since they're the only ones which can access the full
> nanosecond precision.
> 
> Rich
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de


-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to