On 16/11/2011 12:22, William Pitcock wrote: > This is based on Ulrich Drepper's SHA256 crypt implementation in GLIBC. > I decided to add support for this as an option as there have been a few other > SHA256 patches proposed recently. >
Super - thanks for this Could you please consider taking just the blowfish part of my previous patch. Although arguably the SHA hashes are "stronger", the blowfish implementation is used in many web libraries and seems the most standardised hash (in fact so far I don't see any web libraries using SHA?). The benefit is that it's then easy to say have a web application update some hash in a database, it's then automatically supported by any application checking using the libc crypt function? Cheers Ed W _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
