On Dec 3, 2011 12:23 PM, "Ed W" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16/11/2011 12:22, William Pitcock wrote: > > This is based on Ulrich Drepper's SHA256 crypt implementation in GLIBC. > > I decided to add support for this as an option as there have been a few other > > SHA256 patches proposed recently. > > > > Super - thanks for this > > Could you please consider taking just the blowfish part of my previous > patch. Although arguably the SHA hashes are "stronger", the blowfish > implementation is used in many web libraries and seems the most > standardised hash (in fact so far I don't see any web libraries using > SHA?). The benefit is that it's then easy to say have a web application > update some hash in a database, it's then automatically supported by any > application checking using the libc crypt function?
Please send a patch series for these, TIA && cheers, _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
