On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:36:55PM +0100, Richard Braun wrote: > I agree the use of signal() immediately disturbed me, but I didn't read > its implementation. Maybe it does the job. In any case, we could use the > occasion to fix that as well and replace signal() with sigaction() in > the same patch.
In addition, I wonder if the code in the parent immediately following vfork(), which forces SIGINT and SIGQUIT to SIG_IGN once more, is really useful. AIUI, this system call should have no effect on the parent signal dispositions. I'll wait for more feedback before submitting a new patch. -- Richard Braun _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
