On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:54:24AM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: > This is the THIRD time I've told you that blocking SIGCHLD rather than > ignoring it is non-conformant, and I provided the relevant citation > (link and quoted): > > The system() function shall ignore the SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals, > and shall block the SIGCHLD signal, while waiting for the command > to terminate. If this might cause the application to miss a signal > that would have killed it, then the application should examine the > return value from system() and take whatever action is appropriate > to the application if the command terminated due to receipt of a > signal. > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/system.html
Last cordial message before "coding under the influence" accusations : How can you read "shall block the SIGCHLD signal" and understand "blocking SIGCHLD rather than ignoring it is non-conformant" ? Please be very specific as I really don't get your point here. -- Richard Braun _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
