On Feb 9, 2012 8:41 PM, "Khem Raj" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2012 3:48 PM, "Khem Raj" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I would prefer to handle this in the common file like we already do > >> > for e.g. signalfd.h > >> > >> using ifdefs ? > > > > Yes. > > why do you think thats advantageous.
See my first reply in this thread. Furthermore it is easier to keep the common bits in sync if they are in one header as opposed to be in 5 different headers (like we would need for timerfd and eventfd for the affected arches). What are your concerns? _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
