On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > See my first reply in this thread. Furthermore it is easier to keep the > common bits in sync if they are in one header as opposed to be in 5 > different headers (like we would need for timerfd and eventfd for the > affected arches). > What are your concerns?
thats fine so we are treading a path where we make a decision if a file can be overridden or not. I guess we should document it somewhere on when to fork a file and when to use arch specific ifdefs in common file _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
