On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:00 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 24 April 2012 16:50, Mark Salter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Upstream Linux kernel development is requiring new architecture ports to > > use only the default set of generic syscalls. This means familiar syscalls > > http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2011-September/045726.html >
Heh. I knew there had to be patch out there. I saw some other older ones for specific syscalls, but never saw yours in my searching. Looks pretty close to what I've been using but doesn't seem to have generated much interest. I missed the no_cancel bits, but I figured there would be such things broken in my patch too. So, is there any other concerns besides the cancellation? I saw some concern about bloat, but if the approach is to use the noat syscalls if they exist, it shouldn't bloat ports using older kernels. --Mark _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
