On Thursday 26 April 2012 09:32:44 Mark Salter wrote: > without full patch, kernel with old syscalls > text data bss dec hex filename > 45329 1176 172 46677 b655 ld-uClibc-0.9.34-git.so > 52881 18524 8640 80045 138ad libpthread-0.9.34-git.so > 469182 5692 10120 484994 76682 libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so > > with full patch, kernel with old syscalls > text data bss dec hex filename > 45329 1176 172 46677 b655 ld-uClibc-0.9.34-git.so > 52881 18524 8640 80045 138ad libpthread-0.9.34-git.so > 469278 5692 10120 485090 766e2 libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so
why did this increase at all i wonder. if the syscalls are the same, we should take the same code paths ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
