On 2014-08-25 15:17, Khem Raj wrote:
On 14-08-25 12:06:16, [email protected] wrote:
<snipped>
I guess the gap in my knowledge is how uClibc, by only applying to
assembler
files, meets "marking all libraries and executables" when the
GNU_STACK flag
is missing from the ELF images? Note it has been a very long time
since I
it wont. Can you patch UCLIBC_BUILD_NOEXECSTACK code to pass the linker
option as well ?
Yes, I did, that was how I confirmed the UCLIBC_BUILD_NOEXECSTACK option
seems to be ambiguously named.
I have two alternative patches: either
(a) a patch that adds a new option UCLIBC_BUILD_NOEXECSTACK_ALL, to
retain meaning and backward compatibility of the existing config option,
(b) a patch that updates UCLIBC_BUILD_NOEXECSTACK to apply at the linker
stage
I guess I was trying to find out if there was a reason things are the
way they are, prior to submitting one of my patches.
--Andrew
---
http://blog.oldcomputerjunk.net
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
