Greg Ungerer wrote: > Wolf, Josef wrote: > > I'm trying to upgrade from uClinux-dist-20051014 to > > uClinux-dist-20070130. For this, I had to change the toolchain to > > > > http://ftp.snapgear.org/pub/snapgear/tools/arm-linux/arm-linux-tools-200 61213.tar.gz > > > > To get a clean build, I had to make some changes (I have the patch > > I use that tool chain, and with uClinux-dist-20070130 I can > build GDB/ARMulator with no problems. > > What target are you building for?
http://www.embeddedartists.com/products/uclinux/ucl_proto_small.php This board is not supported yet by the official uclinux distribution, but I tried to keep board specific changes separate. > > attached, can somebody apply it to CVS?). This is what the patch > > does: > > > > - replace deprecated -mshort-load-bytes by -malignment-traps > > From patch: > [ ... ] > The purpose of the check as it was is to use either > -mshort-load-bytes (for older compilers) or -malignment-traps for > newer compilers. > > So, for some reason it is not working for you. Can you check back > through the "check_gcc" shell script in this Makefile and try and > determine why this doesn't work right for you? > > (Are you even using this in the arch/arm branch? > I assumed you probably where only compiling for non-MMU?) Oups, my search-and-replace was a bit too aggressive. You're right, the arm directory should not be touched. And for the armnommu directory, it would probably be cleaner to use check_gcc instead of simply replacing the option. > [ -no-fpu in uClinux-dist-20070130/linux-2.4.x/arch/armnommu/Makefile ] > [ ... ] > Uhh, this doesn't appear in this Makefile in 20070130. > Have you mixed up your diffs/patches somehow? I have removed the kernel from 20070130, unpacked vanilla 2.4.32 and applied the uc0-patch for 2.4.32. Since I've done this with the old release, I did not expect problems with this. > > - remove -mno-fpu (not supported by new toolchain) > > Again perhaps you have mixed up your patches/diffs? > The use of -mno-fpu has been removed for ARM targets from 20070130. But it is still in vanilla+uc0, isn't it? _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
