[ Sorry for the late response, but this [censored] Outlook has no threading support :-( ]
> > This board is not supported yet by the official uclinux distribution, > > but I tried to keep board specific changes separate. > Nice price :-) Yes. Unfortunately, I still can't get it stable. :-( And (AFAICS) they don't try to get their changes back upstream :-( > >> [ ... ] > >> Uhh, this doesn't appear in this Makefile in 20070130. > >> Have you mixed up your diffs/patches somehow? > > > > I have removed the kernel from 20070130, unpacked vanilla 2.4.32 and > > applied the uc0-patch for 2.4.32. Since I've done this with the old > > release, I did not expect problems with this. > > > >>> - remove -mno-fpu (not supported by new toolchain) > >> Again perhaps you have mixed up your patches/diffs? > >> The use of -mno-fpu has been removed for ARM targets from 20070130. > > > > But it is still in vanilla+uc0, isn't it? > > No, its not. There have been a number of updates to the linux-2.4.x > code in 20070130 over and above the 2.4.32-uc0 patch. > > You will need to diff/patch against the code as it is in 20070130 > to get an up-to-date patch. Ah, this brings us back to a thread we have discussed a couple of months ago: IMHO, it would be a cleaner solution to _not_ distribute the kernels along with uClinux-dist-XXXX. Instead, the uc0-patches should be part of uClinux-dist-XXXX. With this distribution change the uc0-patches can always be kept consistent with the uClinux-distribution. Currently, patching back and forward is very confusing and very error-prone, IMHO. _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
