Philippe De Muyter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:37:07AM +0100, Stuart Hughes wrote:
Hi Philippe,

I maintain LTIB (the tool). Generally speaking for MMUless platforms I'd recommend using uClinux-dist. However if LTIB has the exact platform you're interested in that may be helpful as it will be known to work out of the box. The compiler used in LTIB should work with uClinux-dist notwithstanding some gcc strictness issues (depends on version). You may also find some of the patches to the kernel that are not yet in mainstream may be useful. For platforms with MMUs I'd recommend LTIB though (no surprise there).

The MCF5484 has a MMU, but linux-2.6.30 (even in uclinux-dist flavour)
does not seem to use it : I grep'ped for mmubar in the whole source tree
without result.

Does the ltib-provided kernel use the mmu ?  And if that's the case,
is there an ongoing effort to merge those mmu patches in the uclinux-
or Linus' kernel tree ?


I believe the kernel in LTIB does run with the MMU. The platform abstractions themselves (kernel/bootloader) are maintained by different teams. You'll need to contact Freescale to find out where there are regarding merging into the mainline.

Regards, Stuart
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

Reply via email to