On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 08:40:29AM +0100, Stuart Hughes wrote: > Philippe De Muyter wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:37:07AM +0100, Stuart Hughes wrote: >>> Hi Philippe, >>> >>> I maintain LTIB (the tool). Generally speaking for MMUless platforms I'd >>> recommend using uClinux-dist. However if LTIB has the exact platform >>> you're interested in that may be helpful as it will be known to work out >>> of the box. The compiler used in LTIB should work with uClinux-dist >>> notwithstanding some gcc strictness issues (depends on version). You may >>> also find some of the patches to the kernel that are not yet in >>> mainstream may be useful. For platforms with MMUs I'd recommend LTIB >>> though (no surprise there). >> The MCF5484 has a MMU, but linux-2.6.30 (even in uclinux-dist flavour) >> does not seem to use it : I grep'ped for mmubar in the whole source tree >> without result. >> Does the ltib-provided kernel use the mmu ? And if that's the case, >> is there an ongoing effort to merge those mmu patches in the uclinux- >> or Linus' kernel tree ? > > I believe the kernel in LTIB does run with the MMU. The platform > abstractions themselves (kernel/bootloader) are maintained by different > teams. You'll need to contact Freescale to find out where there are > regarding merging into the mainline.
After reading this : http://rtg.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/docs/da-sa-txt/sa-steal.pdf I don't feel anymore it is interesting. Thanks for your answers Philippe _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
