On Thursday 15 October 2009 03:20:11 Michael Schnell wrote: > Thanks for answering. > > I found it "unfortunate" that hush did not have built-in cat, when doing > haserl scripts (otherwise much better with hush than with the > depreciated msh). > > Do others agree that it's desirable ?
do you see significant/any performance differences ? if there's a real perf gain, then we can add it. > If yes I might plan to add this feature some day soon. i just added printf as a builtin. should show how easy it would be to add cat as a builtin: http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4ebc76c8a23367eaec29931b77e10e3ee890dd7d -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
